<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The dark side of Ron Paul, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Dec 2008 14:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: david ainsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/#comment-35410</link>
		<dc:creator>david ainsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/#comment-35410</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul also supports sodomy laws.  Not exactly a libertarian stance.  But I have had the same experience you had when I dare tell St Paul supporters about his real record. They are a fanatical bunch who have delusions about their candidate and they don't like being confronted with contrary evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul also supports sodomy laws.  Not exactly a libertarian stance.  But I have had the same experience you had when I dare tell St Paul supporters about his real record. They are a fanatical bunch who have delusions about their candidate and they don&#8217;t like being confronted with contrary evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trisha</title>
		<link>http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/#comment-28222</link>
		<dc:creator>Trisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/#comment-28222</guid>
		<description>I mean Trusted TO give us the freedom we crave as individuals(gay,pro-choice,etc.).Sorry about that mistake.

I personally don't agree with homosexuality or abortion either but who am I to tell you how to run your life.That is between you and God or whatever you believe.Ron PAul thinks from this view point to.He can have his opinion on isssues but not impose them on you and make them law just because he doesn't agree with them.He will not do that.Freedom is freedom for ALL people no matter what their culture,beliefs,or lifestyles are.Ron Paul supports the last sentence I just said.Don't be bigoted against him because his beliefs and opinions don't agree with yours,then you are doing the very thing you accuse him of doing.When I know he is neutral-live your life the WAY you want,not the way he or government wants you to live it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean Trusted TO give us the freedom we crave as individuals(gay,pro-choice,etc.).Sorry about that mistake.</p>
<p>I personally don&#8217;t agree with homosexuality or abortion either but who am I to tell you how to run your life.That is between you and God or whatever you believe.Ron PAul thinks from this view point to.He can have his opinion on isssues but not impose them on you and make them law just because he doesn&#8217;t agree with them.He will not do that.Freedom is freedom for ALL people no matter what their culture,beliefs,or lifestyles are.Ron Paul supports the last sentence I just said.Don&#8217;t be bigoted against him because his beliefs and opinions don&#8217;t agree with yours,then you are doing the very thing you accuse him of doing.When I know he is neutral-live your life the WAY you want,not the way he or government wants you to live it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trisha</title>
		<link>http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/#comment-28221</link>
		<dc:creator>Trisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/#comment-28221</guid>
		<description>The people as a whole should be able to vote on these personal issues.Not state government nor federal government.Ron Paul is leaving the personal issues up to the americans of each state to vote on(not himself,not the federal,not the state governments).If the people as a whole/majority are against certain issues in each individual state then that should be LAW in that state.The minority of personal issues(gay marriage and abortion) should not be forced to be accepted by the Majority of the state because of a few people.Also on the other side if the majority accept gay marriage and abortion in a particular state and the minority doesn't accept it than the minority loses and the law should be in favor of the majority.

This is what Ron Paul is saying.He is NOT bigoted in any way towards personal issues.He is basically saying he does not want to run our lives.He is a christian and believes that our sins are our own.Let God deal with people and what they believe,not Ron Paul.

Ron Paul is neutral and has personal preferences but knows that a good leader has to accept his views and that of others to keep peace.

The main thing we need to worry about is Freedom and truth.Ron Paul is not afraid to represent both in the face of the NWO opposition even though his life and that of his family is at risk for going against the nazi like government establishment hell bent on running our lives and making us their slaves by spoon feeding us their ideologies(while claiming freedom to make us think we have it and don't even realize we are losing it),stealing from us through taxes so we are poor,telling us we can't use herbalist doctors because they are dangerous(when really they are a threat to big pharma because they actually CURE and for people to be healthy 100% of the time would make big pharma poor),and forcing us to PAY for welfare and SS for illegal immigrants with our hard earned tax money when they haven't paid a damn dime into it and we can barely afford to support our own families because of the taxes we HAVE to pay for them and a war we don't agree with.Ron Paul wants to give the liberties and money the federal government have stolen from us. He cares!

Is Freedom too much to ask for?Why would he want freedom and then turn around and take it from pro-choicers and gays?He would not.He may not agree but he has no agenda to steal your freedom to run your own lives the way you see fit.His voting record and speeches (on You Tube: Neo-Conned by Congressman Ron Paul Pt.1-11)prove he is a man of his word and can be trusted not to give us the freedom we crave.

Stop and use your brains.Ron Paul is our only hope to liberty in the USA(Jesus is #1 freedom in our lives).Lets not screw up a once in a life time chance over the small things because he isn't worried about those and does not want to force us to live the way he would live in thought and actions(this is a true leader),he wants us to have free thought,speech,and prosperous lives OUR WAY and NOT HIS or governments way.He DOES NOT(want to) nor will he, run our lives.The BIGGEST picture(freedom from CFR/NWO elite slave masters in which he is the only candidate who is NOT one of them) of all is at stake if you do not realize your BIAS against Ron PAUL

One thing we can all agree on is we want freedom and he is our only earthly(Jesus is our freedom 1st) ticket to that dream in the USA,whether you are black,white,etc.,gay,straight,pro-choice,pro-life--we all have the same goal/FREEDOM!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people as a whole should be able to vote on these personal issues.Not state government nor federal government.Ron Paul is leaving the personal issues up to the americans of each state to vote on(not himself,not the federal,not the state governments).If the people as a whole/majority are against certain issues in each individual state then that should be LAW in that state.The minority of personal issues(gay marriage and abortion) should not be forced to be accepted by the Majority of the state because of a few people.Also on the other side if the majority accept gay marriage and abortion in a particular state and the minority doesn&#8217;t accept it than the minority loses and the law should be in favor of the majority.</p>
<p>This is what Ron Paul is saying.He is NOT bigoted in any way towards personal issues.He is basically saying he does not want to run our lives.He is a christian and believes that our sins are our own.Let God deal with people and what they believe,not Ron Paul.</p>
<p>Ron Paul is neutral and has personal preferences but knows that a good leader has to accept his views and that of others to keep peace.</p>
<p>The main thing we need to worry about is Freedom and truth.Ron Paul is not afraid to represent both in the face of the NWO opposition even though his life and that of his family is at risk for going against the nazi like government establishment hell bent on running our lives and making us their slaves by spoon feeding us their ideologies(while claiming freedom to make us think we have it and don&#8217;t even realize we are losing it),stealing from us through taxes so we are poor,telling us we can&#8217;t use herbalist doctors because they are dangerous(when really they are a threat to big pharma because they actually CURE and for people to be healthy 100% of the time would make big pharma poor),and forcing us to PAY for welfare and SS for illegal immigrants with our hard earned tax money when they haven&#8217;t paid a damn dime into it and we can barely afford to support our own families because of the taxes we HAVE to pay for them and a war we don&#8217;t agree with.Ron Paul wants to give the liberties and money the federal government have stolen from us. He cares!</p>
<p>Is Freedom too much to ask for?Why would he want freedom and then turn around and take it from pro-choicers and gays?He would not.He may not agree but he has no agenda to steal your freedom to run your own lives the way you see fit.His voting record and speeches (on You Tube: Neo-Conned by Congressman Ron Paul Pt.1-11)prove he is a man of his word and can be trusted not to give us the freedom we crave.</p>
<p>Stop and use your brains.Ron Paul is our only hope to liberty in the USA(Jesus is #1 freedom in our lives).Lets not screw up a once in a life time chance over the small things because he isn&#8217;t worried about those and does not want to force us to live the way he would live in thought and actions(this is a true leader),he wants us to have free thought,speech,and prosperous lives OUR WAY and NOT HIS or governments way.He DOES NOT(want to) nor will he, run our lives.The BIGGEST picture(freedom from CFR/NWO elite slave masters in which he is the only candidate who is NOT one of them) of all is at stake if you do not realize your BIAS against Ron PAUL</p>
<p>One thing we can all agree on is we want freedom and he is our only earthly(Jesus is our freedom 1st) ticket to that dream in the USA,whether you are black,white,etc.,gay,straight,pro-choice,pro-life&#8211;we all have the same goal/FREEDOM!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Cynic</title>
		<link>http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/#comment-27633</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/#comment-27633</guid>
		<description>Okay.... I just figured it out.    I just found out where all of Ron Paul's supporters are.....  they are responding to this blog.   State's Rights ( pronounced "rats" in the south) was the issue leading to the civil war.  The issue of slavery was the emotional gun powder used to incite the battle.

In the last six years we have seen individual liberties abridged by a fear mongering moron and the puppeteers who pull his strings.   These people have turned hate and malice into an industry.   There will never be solutions to the serious issues in this country when the solutions is "states rights".  That friends, is passing the buck by politicians who were born without spines and/or testicles.   With both his manhood and his spine missing, I am amazed that Ronb Paul could dance that Texas Two Step so well in the debates.

Nice job, Shane, of smoking out these bigots.    It was intersting to see how the thinly disguised hatred began to flow as you called each of them out, comment by comment.  We shold all feel better that Ron Paul wingnut followers apparently represent only 1% of the people.    

Ron Paul got a couple of flippant comments off in what was a deadly boring debate.  He got some press; his 15 minutes of fame.  Frankly I think this good ol' boy has had a little too much "bourbon and branch".      

Henry David Thoreau had it right when he wrote "Not less government, but no government now!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay&#8230;. I just figured it out.    I just found out where all of Ron Paul&#8217;s supporters are&#8230;..  they are responding to this blog.   State&#8217;s Rights ( pronounced &#8220;rats&#8221; in the south) was the issue leading to the civil war.  The issue of slavery was the emotional gun powder used to incite the battle.</p>
<p>In the last six years we have seen individual liberties abridged by a fear mongering moron and the puppeteers who pull his strings.   These people have turned hate and malice into an industry.   There will never be solutions to the serious issues in this country when the solutions is &#8220;states rights&#8221;.  That friends, is passing the buck by politicians who were born without spines and/or testicles.   With both his manhood and his spine missing, I am amazed that Ronb Paul could dance that Texas Two Step so well in the debates.</p>
<p>Nice job, Shane, of smoking out these bigots.    It was intersting to see how the thinly disguised hatred began to flow as you called each of them out, comment by comment.  We shold all feel better that Ron Paul wingnut followers apparently represent only 1% of the people.    </p>
<p>Ron Paul got a couple of flippant comments off in what was a deadly boring debate.  He got some press; his 15 minutes of fame.  Frankly I think this good ol&#8217; boy has had a little too much &#8220;bourbon and branch&#8221;.      </p>
<p>Henry David Thoreau had it right when he wrote &#8220;Not less government, but no government now!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/#comment-26249</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/#comment-26249</guid>
		<description>Mike,

First off, I'm a registered libertarian in the state of Kansas.  I've posted a pictyure of my registration before.  This isn't a matter of me believing in a small federal government or not.

This is about Ron Paul using the federal government to promote his own religious beliefs on others, and restricting the rights of others.

I don't want to live in a country where "states rights" is thinly veiled code for hating on gays an women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>First off, I&#8217;m a registered libertarian in the state of Kansas.  I&#8217;ve posted a pictyure of my registration before.  This isn&#8217;t a matter of me believing in a small federal government or not.</p>
<p>This is about Ron Paul using the federal government to promote his own religious beliefs on others, and restricting the rights of others.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to live in a country where &#8220;states rights&#8221; is thinly veiled code for hating on gays an women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/#comment-26248</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanebrady.com/2007/06/05/the-dark-side-of-ron-paul-part-ii/#comment-26248</guid>
		<description>Shane, you miss the point completely.  By giving power to the states, you're openning up the possibility of some states enacting discriminatory laws, true, but you're also openning up the possibility of the federal government enacting discriminatory laws for the entire nation.  It is better to risk a few states with bad laws, then risk the entire nation having bad laws.

FURTHERMORE, if you really believe the federal government should expand its powers into the realm of the definition of marriage and abortion rights, then you should advocate a change to the constitution.  This is what Ron Paul has said: that the current attempt by the federal government to impose legislation upon the entire nation are unconstituional, and that if Americans want the federal government to do so, then the constitution needs to be amended.

The constitution will not be worth the paper it is written on if it is ignored when it is deemed convenient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shane, you miss the point completely.  By giving power to the states, you&#8217;re openning up the possibility of some states enacting discriminatory laws, true, but you&#8217;re also openning up the possibility of the federal government enacting discriminatory laws for the entire nation.  It is better to risk a few states with bad laws, then risk the entire nation having bad laws.</p>
<p>FURTHERMORE, if you really believe the federal government should expand its powers into the realm of the definition of marriage and abortion rights, then you should advocate a change to the constitution.  This is what Ron Paul has said: that the current attempt by the federal government to impose legislation upon the entire nation are unconstituional, and that if Americans want the federal government to do so, then the constitution needs to be amended.</p>
<p>The constitution will not be worth the paper it is written on if it is ignored when it is deemed convenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
